明天又要去远方，
面对无法看清的未来依然是那样的迷茫和困顿，
未来的路咱们走，现在的脚去那方？
终于明白，
有时候人不是因为没有选择而痛苦，令你痛心的竟是选择太多，
乱花渐入迷入眼竟让人无所适从，
有时候，你并不是知道你面前的是机遇还是陷阱，
但是你必须向前，勇敢的向进入战场的武士一样，
不知道未来会怎么样？
但是你要记住，
一定不要忘了去发展自己，一定要提高自己，
一定要明白机会越多陷阱也就越多，谦虚谨慎，低调内敛，
一定不要把英语放下啊，苦练听力会让你在未来有一个更广阔的空间，
一定提高自己的专业知识，比如excel vba编程，各种经济预测技术、财务分析能力等等，
一定把技术作为自己和别人差距的门槛！
一定要学习为人处世的道理，相信生活会磨练自己！
记住自己的路，自己走！
Remember the term "water cooler moment"; in which a TV show generated a social buzz and was talked about by colleagues at work after broadcast?
It seems to me that there are fewer and fewer water cooler moments, in part because television has become less of a cohesively social experience.
PVRS, video on demand, BitTorrent, digital download stores, DVD box sets have all helped to fracture the common viewing experience.
We tend to watch our TV content out of sync with one another these days.
But last night I experienced a water cooler moment as a programme was being broadcast. It was social TV at the point of broadcast, and it was thanks to Twitter.
Eurovision is precisely the kind of mass experience and mass participation event that made, and arguably still makes, TV so social.
People have parties, print off voting forms etc to help make the event more inclusive.
But that sense of common viewing is restricted to people in your living room, or friends pinging each other text messages.
Last night I was watching Eurovision with Twitter runnng on my laptop. In real time, my Twitter friends and I shared comments and made observations about the event as it was happening.
Twitter was being used to exend the experience of watching the event together, but also for people to share links to sites with backstory, or explainers etc.
Social TV became a kind of informed viewing experience. Amidst my friends and followers there were "power viewers", those who were able to add detail, explanation and expertise to the viewing, and "empowered viewers", those of us whose experience of combining TV and Twitter was made richer.
You could not only share pithy comments with friends on Twitter, but by searching for Eurovision on Tweetscan you could see what the whole Twitter community was saying about the event.
People were also encourage to "tag" their Eurovision comments using a hashtag, #eurovision, and so posts directly relating to the event could be followed in real time.
Other Twitter services like Summarize could also be used to grab a wider flavour of the discussions and debate.
So does this mean anything? Arguably all Twitter did was turn an old fashioned mass participation event, viewing Eurovision, into the digital age.
But imagine how Twitter could be used to build instant communities around real time TV content, be it programmes or event TV?
The interesting thing about last night was that it was totally spontaneous. There may be resistance/reluctance to doing this on a more structured, premeditated basis; but it would be an interesting experiment.
Twitter plus TV = informed viewing.
I'm excited by the potential.
Two weeks after walking away from takeover talks with Yahoo, Microsoft has made it clear that it still needs to create an Internet powerhouse that could rival Google — and that its interest in Yahoo has not waned.
Microsoft said on Sunday that it had approached Yahoo, this time with an ostensibly narrower aim: a collaboration on Internet advertising. But it hinted that it could still seek a takeover down the road.
The renewed talks reflect both Microsoft’s fears and Yahoo’s potential ills. Microsoft wants to head off any collaboration on advertising between Yahoo and the market leader, Google. At the same time, Microsoft is seeking to capitalize on the perceived weakness of Yahoo, which is facing a proxy battle with the activist investor Carl C. Icahn over the failed takeover talks.
Mr. Icahn, who has made a career out of agitating for change at some of the nation’s largest companies, bought a stake in Yahoo after the Microsoft takeover negotiations collapsed. He has named a slate of directors and threatened to unseat Yahoo’s management — or at least push Yahoo back into Microsoft’s arms.
On Monday morning, the report of Microsoft’s renewed interest in Yahoo had only a mild effect on the two companies’ stocks. In afternoon trading, Yahoo was at $27.93, up 27 cents, and Microsoft was at $29.60, off 39 cents.
Microsoft released a brief statement on Sunday disclosing the renewed talks, a surprising reversal just weeks after it withdrew its $47.5 billion bid for Yahoo and said it had “moved on.”
In an e-mail message to Microsoft employees on Sunday afternoon, a senior Microsoft executive seemed to acknowledge that moving on might be difficult.
In his memo, Kevin Johnson, the executive in charge of Microsoft’s Internet business, emphasized the urgency felt at Microsoft about its failure to make more progress in catching up to Google.
“Regardless of the outcome of any new discussions,” he wrote, “it is important that we continue to move forward to strengthen our online services business. The fact is that we are not where we want to be in this business yet and we’ve been in this position longer than we’d all like.”
Mr. Johnson then outlined Microsoft’s ambitious agenda in Internet search and online advertising, exploiting the company’s strengths in desktop software and newer fields like cellphone software. Among the goals enumerated in the memo are to “innovate and disrupt in search,” “win in display” ads online and “reinvent portal and social media experiences.”
Microsoft’s hastily revived effort to reach some kind of deal with Yahoo seems to suggest that the software giant has doubts about whether it can achieve those goals on its own.
Indeed, Microsoft’s on-again, off-again interest in Yahoo has raised questions from analysts, investors, customers and employees about its strategy. Amid the discussions, Microsoft is scheduled to present its online strategy to advertisers at a gathering this week.
People involved in the confidential discussions between Microsoft and Yahoo said the talks centered on a partnership or joint venture for search-related advertising to compete against Google. When Microsoft first made its unsolicited bid of $31 a share for Yahoo in February, it said it was doing so as part of its battle to increase its relatively small slice of the search-related advertising market against Google, a giant with about 60 percent of the United States market, according to the measurement firm comScore.
By comparison, Yahoo has about 21 percent of the market, and Microsoft has about 9 percent, comScore said.
The timing of Microsoft’s new approach may be a turning point in the months-long story or just an opportunistic effort to further insert itself into a dance between Yahoo and Google. Yahoo has been racing to complete its own partnership with Google and was expected to announce a formal agreement as early as this week. A Yahoo-Google partnership, which would likely face antitrust scrutiny, could make Yahoo a less desirable partner or takeover candidate for Microsoft.
The Google-Yahoo discussions have been centered around the notion of Google delivering ads alongside some Yahoo searches. Such a deal would help Yahoo generate more cash, because Google’s search advertising technology is more sophisticated and is used by more advertisers. As a result, Google earns more on every search than its competitors, on average.
A similar partnership between Yahoo and Microsoft might not have the same effect, because Microsoft’s base of advertisers is smaller than Yahoo’s. People involved in the confidential discussions said that search advertising was certainly a part of Microsoft’s renewed interest in Yahoo, but they cautioned that any relationship being discussed might be different from the one the company had been contemplating with Google.
A Google representative did not return a phone call seeking comment.
It is unclear whether Microsoft would pursue a takeover bid again. In its statement on Sunday, Microsoft insisted it was not making such a bid, but hinted that it could be persuaded to reverse course.
“Microsoft is not proposing to make a new bid to acquire all of Yahoo at this time, but reserves the right to reconsider that alternative depending on future developments and discussions that may take place with Yahoo or discussions with shareholders of Yahoo or Microsoft or with other third parties,” the company said.
The new discussions also come as Yahoo is facing increasing pressure from shareholders, some of whom are furious that its board did not work harder to reach a deal to sell the company to Microsoft. Last week, Mr. Icahn said the directors had “acted irrationally and lost the faith of shareholders.” People close to Microsoft and Mr. Icahn say that neither has been in contact with the other.
Yahoo released a statement late on Sunday saying that it continues to explore strategic alternatives and remains open to any proposals that are good for its shareholders.
“Yahoo’s board of directors will evaluate each of our alternatives, including any Microsoft proposal, consistent with its fiduciary duties, with a focus on maximizing stockholder value,” the statement said. Yahoo also said that it had confirmed with Microsoft that the software giant was not interested an outright acquisition of Yahoo at this time.
同重量的黑芝麻，含鈣量達牛奶的十八倍
現年六十七歲的
鍾太太不慎滑了一跤，傷到腰椎，起先以為是扭傷，到國術館去推拿敷草藥，看了三個月沒效，之後到長庚醫院照Ｘ光，醫師告訴她，腰椎受到壓迫性骨折了，摔跤固然是直接因素，間接兇手則是骨質疏鬆嚴重，根本禁不起任何碰撞。
正值荳蔻年華的小雲，終年都穿著鬆鬆垮垮的長褲和平底鞋，對時下少女「粉炫」的打扮──緊身褲或短裙、高蹻式厚底鞋，根本無福消受，因為她的膝蓋無力，不論寒暑都得套著厚厚的護膝，醫師說她的骨骼很「ＬＫＫ」，大約等於六十歲的人。
根據美國醫學單位統計，美國六十五歲以上的婦女，每四人中有一人已喪失百分之五十的骨骼密度。台灣雖然迄今未有精確統計資料，但骨頭退化的年齡層已明顯愈來愈降低，二十歲～三十歲常見腰酸背痛；四十歲～五十歲就出現五十肩、下背痛；六十歲以上則彎腰駝背，舉步維艱。
不錯，骨質疏鬆症已成為現代人揮之不去的夢魘，尤其是更年期後的婦女，骨骼中礦物質的流失速度更為驚人，若不能及時防治，隨之而來的就是長期背痛、動輒骨折、個子愈來愈矮、背愈來愈駝，這時脆弱的脊椎已無法支撐身體的重量，內部器官因受擠壓而失去正常運作功能，以致百病叢生。
骨質疏鬆的主要原因是鈣質流失，而喝汽水、可樂〈含「磷酸」很高,會把鈣吸走
形成磷酸鈣,排出體外〉、吃垃圾食物、過量的鹽也是致病因素。醫師通常會告訴病人錯誤資訊，預防骨質疏鬆，須從補充鈣質、適度運動、多曬太陽、控制飲食著手。對於鈣質的補充，很多報章雜誌都大力鼓吹──每天喝三大杯牛奶，更誇張的，有些還建議小孩把牛奶當開水喝。
牛奶的含鈣量有多少？從附表來看，一百公克的牛奶含鈣一百一十毫克，而同重量的黑芝麻，含鈣量達牛奶的十八倍，海帶芽是十二倍，苜蓿芽三倍，黑豆、芥蘭、莧菜、紫菜、豆皮等，鈣含量也比牛奶多得多。
牛奶不是「鈣」高尚的食品，更諷刺的是，乳品消耗量愈高的國家，骨質疏鬆症的罹患率愈高。美國出版的「新世紀飲食」一書中，作者約翰‧羅彬斯廣泛蒐集資料，發現美國、芬蘭、瑞典及英國人骨質疏鬆最普遍，而落後貧窮的非洲班圖人婦女，每天只攝取三百五十毫克的鈣，她們平均生九個孩子，每個小孩餵母奶二年，卻從來沒有缺鈣的現象，骨骼密度遠高過富裕的已開發國家人民。這是什麼原因？
現在的醫學界已漸漸證明，過多的蛋白質(肉類;產生”酸”)會把鈣帶出體外，也就是說，攝取的蛋白質愈多，流失的鈣也愈多。牛奶、酸乳酪、奶酪等製品，蛋白質含量很高，所以，當您猛吃這類食品，一心想補充鈣質時，殊不知一場驅逐戰正在體內悄悄展開，這些食物所含的高量蛋白質正毫不留情地把鈣驅逐出境。
新世紀飲食一書也舉一個極特殊的實例──愛斯基摩人的飲食中，蛋白質含量居全世界冠軍，一天約二百五十公克到四百公克，取自魚、海象及鯨魚等，可是很不幸地，他們患骨質疏鬆症的比率也排名世界第一。
一九八四年八月的美國「醫學論壇」刊登一篇美國人骨骼密度研究報告，指出素食者的骨骼比一般人強壯很多。
美國密西根州立大學也做過類似研究，發現美國六十五歲以上的人：男性素食者平均骨質損失百分之三。肉食者損失百分之七。女性素食者平均骨質損失百分之十八，肉食者損失百分之三十五。
為什麼這樣？因為肉食者平均攝取的蛋白質比素食者高很多。
由這些實證，可見預防骨質疏鬆症的第一要務，不是多吃高鈣食物，而是少吃高蛋白質食物。
因此，當您下次要喝牛奶補鈣時，可得要仔細想一想，此舉是否真的「鈣」得住？
常見食物中鈣的含量
(毫克
/100克)
蔬菜
堅果類
豆類製品
海菜類
其他
九層塔
320
黑芝麻
2000
黃豆干
40 洋菜
567
牛奶
110
金針
340 白芝麻
440
豆腐
91
黑海帶
1170
小魚乾
1700
木耳
270 葵瓜子
120 黑豆
260
紅藻
567
蝦米
1438
乾蓮子
114
杏仁
234 五香豆干 143 羊西菜
1400 吻仔魚
349
蕪菁
184
花生
72 豆枝
543 苔類
885
蛤
156
菠菜 93
榛果—夏威夷果
209
豆皮 280
昆布 1100 牡蠣
58
番薯菜
153
胡桃
186
黃豆
216 海帶芽
1300
雞蛋
60
芥蘭菜
230
斑豆(乾)
135
海菜
311
米糠
200
莧菜
300 埃及豆（乾）150 髮菜
699 麥糠
123
花椰菜
103
大豆粉
199
紫菜
850
燕麥片
142
包心菜
106
原味優酪乳 120
苜蓿芽
333
枸杞
134
甜菜
50
無花果
196
小麥草
紅糖
85
味噌
150
“北大是常为新的”新解
□陈远/文
《财经网》 [ 05-09 20:38
]
今天，我更愿把鲁迅先生之“北大是常为新的”，以警语视之
(一)
轰轰烈烈的北大110周年校庆刚刚过去，作为一个媒体人，又刚好做了一个篇幅长达16个版的北大110周年特刊，对于北大，似乎应该不再有什么话可 讲。可偏偏不是这样，北大110周年的历程，与中国同一时期的历史息息相关，光要说清楚这个话题，就是一个长篇。不过，这是题外话。但恰恰也是这个原因，
让北大格外惹人注意。
不说别的，单就北大的传统这一点，就要颇费周章：和北大历史年头相近的几个学校，清华也好，复旦也好，浙大也好，传统都很好说，不好说的，只有北大。
为什么如此，或许和北大特别珍重自己的历史有关。没有哪个学校像北大这样热衷于纪念自己：自蔡元培掌校之后，北大几乎是十年一大庆，五年一小庆，既然有如
此多的纪念，关于传统有多种阐释也就不足为怪。
甚至不是整年数的时候，北大也会时不时纪念一下。比如1925年，北大学生会为纪念校庆27周年，就曾向鲁迅紧急约稿。为此，鲁迅写下了《我观北大》
一文。在文章中，鲁迅提出了一句至今仍常常被人征引的话：北大是常为新的，改进的运动的先锋，要使中国向着好的，往上的道路走。“横眉冷对”的鲁迅，对于
北大的感情并不强烈：在北大，鲁迅只是“教一两点钟的讲师”，所以被有的教授指责“不配与闻校事”。以鲁迅的性格，会对在北大的经历感到舒服吗？
鲁迅之所以表现出对北大一片温情脉脉，一来约稿者是学生，对于青年，鲁迅一向是爱护的。所以这一片温情，与其说送给北大，不如说送给北大的学生；二
来，迅翁心中也明白，纪念刊上的文字，是一种特殊的文体，越是这样的时候，越不能揭人家的伤疤，而越是精彩的好话，则越有可能被后人征引。或谓此为诛心之
论，无凭无据，则不妨看看四年之后刘半农在《北京大学三十一周年纪念刊》说的话。刘半农当年为《北京大学三十一周年纪念刊》撰稿，提及纪念文章之难写，称
不外“说老话”与“说好话”两种做法。这一点，刘半农清楚，鲁迅也清楚。
如果说证据还不充分，不妨再来看同一个鲁迅，关于同一个话题的不同叙述：1933年，鲁迅给台静农写信时说到北大：“北大堕落至此，殊可叹息，若讲标 语各增一字，作‘五四失精神’，‘时代在前进’，则较切矣。”很难说三十年代的北大与二十年代的北大有如此的“天壤之别”。1933年，北大的校长是蒋梦
麟先生，这位北大历史上任期最长的校长和胡适师出同门，且是教育科班出身，对于北大的贡献着实不小。北大在他的治下，也未曾“堕落”。不过，1933年，
鲁迅已经离开北大，又是私人通信，且又针对具体的人和事，为求痛快淋漓，则偏颇之处难免。
(二)
不过，抛开鲁迅说话的具体语境和时代背景，在众多对北大传统的阐释中，还是迅翁的说辞最准确，也最得我心。时贤总结北大传统，一厢
情愿，各执一词。比如教育学者总愿意把北大的传统说成“兼容并包”，而政治学者则愿意把北大传统总结为“自由主义”，官方和北大校方则愿意把北大传统定格
于“爱国主义”……
不能说没有道理，但是这样的总结，也总让我想起一个众人皆知的典故：盲人摸象。都以为自己说到了北大传统的核心，其实只是说到了一个方面，只有迅翁的“常为新”一语，没有具体指向，反倒最贴切。
从北大历史来看，北大也确实做到了“常为新”：北大的校史从1898年算起，不攀附太学传统，连有直接渊源的同文馆也都排除在外，直接选定戊戌年“大 学堂”的创立作为自己历史的开端，其实暗含了北大的自我定位：与其成为历代太学的正宗传人，不如扮演引进西学的开路先锋。北大一开始，就要“为新”。
五四运动、白话文运动、大学招收女生……一直到“一二?九”运动，再到后来的反饥饿、反内战，无不与北大息息相关，北大确实“常为新”。
北大还有另外“常为新”的一面，不大为人提起。新中国成立之后最常被人们提及的北大校长是马寅初先生。不过，人们说起马先生往往与他因“人口论”冒犯
龙颜有关。我对于马先生的骨气也尊崇有加。但人们很少提起的是，在马先生冒犯龙颜前，曾经引发过思想改造运动。担任校长不久，针对解放初期师生员工的实际
情况，为倡导师生学习政治、改造思想，马寅初首先在北大教师中发起了一个以改造思想、改革高等教育为目的的学习运动，并邀请周恩来为北大教育学习会作第一
次报告。后来，全国范围内兴起的知识分子思想改造运动，就是以此为发端。
1966年，文革在北大校园内打响了第一枪。出自聂元梓手笔的《宋硕、陆平、彭佩云在文化革命中究竟干些什么？》，不仅使聂当上北大校文革主任，也拉
开了中国十年文化大革命的序幕。那一段岁月，人们提起来都会用到“不堪回首”。“不堪”是真，“回首”也很必要。北大一直领风气之先，正视历史，更能显现 北大的荣光。
北大还有“为新”和不敢“为新”的矛盾：改革开放之初，能有哪个出自民间的口号比得上“小平您好”？这一世界著名的口号，已成为人们对邓小平开创的改
革开放时代的情感怀念。其发源地就是北京大学。当北大学生们打出“小平您好”标语的那一刻，时任北京大学副校长的陈佳洱正在天安门的观礼台上。他的第一反 应是“北大学生是不是闯祸啦?!”因为“原来规定不能随便带东西的。同学带了这个标语了，学校可要挨批评了”。“
吓一跳”的陈佳洱“看看小平同志”，结果邓小平没有生气，并且带头鼓掌，陈校长才“高兴”起来。
不是非要揭短，虽然无缘在北大读书，也无缘在北大执教，但是热爱蔡元培时期的北大，热爱蒋梦麟掌校的北大，热爱胡适治下的北大，也热爱当下的北大，才
希望北大正视历史。惟如此，才能显示一所世界一流大学的胸襟和坦荡。可是现在，我再跟很多毕业于北大的朋友谈起这些，面对的多是一脸茫然。
就在鲁迅在私人通信中指责北大“堕落”的1933年，刘半农在为《北京大学卅五周年纪念刊》撰写纪念文章时，就是从鲁迅给北大设计的校徽谈起的，刘半农说：
我以为这愁眉苦脸的校徽，正在指示我们应取的态度，应走的路。我们唯有在愁眉苦脸中生活着，唯有在愁眉苦脸中咬紧了牙齿苦干着，在愁眉苦脸中用沉着刚毅的精神挣扎着，然后才可以找到一条光明的出路。
而鲁迅在写《我观北大》时，在文章结尾也作了预先声明，称明年若再出纪念刊，则难以从命。之后，鲁迅确实也没有公开评论北大的文章，我想原因大概不仅仅是“说起来大约还是这些话”。
综上所述：在今天，我更愿把迅翁“北大是常为新的”之语，以警语视之。■
作者为资深媒体人
用手机短信的方式为灾区人民捐款 一两元就可以
当然 钱是从话费里面扣的
如果你愿意捐一元 那么就发1到1069 999309
如果你愿意捐两元 那么就发2到1069 999309。
http://gongyi.qq.com/juanzeng/llj_dizhen.htm
听说血库也告急了，捐血也可以啊。
Dear ChenKai: Have not seen you or talked with you for a long time. You did not come to our recent thesis classes.
How is everything for your work and study? I just thought about you and want to drop you a note. Nothing serious or critical! When you have time, drop me a note to keep me posted.
Regards,
老师，你太好了，还惦记着我。是我见过的最好的老师，你对学生太好了。
你是我见过的最好的组织行为学教授，你的学识，你的修养，你对中华民族的深深思考，都那么让人钦佩。
你常常深夜还在改我们学生的作业，你那密密麻麻的评语，你的辛勤的付出，一定会收获硕果。
如果中国能多些您这样的大学教授，中国也许会更快崛起。
您说你不是中国人，但是你对中国的爱胜过大多数的中国人！
Powered by Haiwit
